# SAT Math Strategies That Work: Listing Things Out to Find Patterns

An extremely useful yet often forgotten strategy is listing things out. So many students overlook this strategy, dismissing it as non-mathematical, brute force, or inelegant, but as we’ll see, some questions can ONLY be done by listing things out to reveal patterns.

To see how this works, here are three example SAT questions:

1. On a square gameboard that is divided into $$n$$ rows of $$n$$ squares each, $$k$$ of these squares lie along the boundary of the gameboard. Which of the following is a possible value for $$k$$?
A) 25
B) 34
C) 42
D) 52

Instead of dilly-dallying, let’s start by drawing a couple cases out, something you should do even if you don’t know where it’ll take you:

Now with each case, we’ll just count the number of squares along the boundary to get $$k$$.

For the $$2 \times 2$$, we have $$k = 4$$.
For the $$3 \times 3$$, we have $$k = 8$$.
For the $$4 \times 4$$, we have $$k = 12$$.

Do you notice a pattern for $$k$$?

You should’ve noticed that they’re all multiples of 4. So the answer must be a multiple of 4.

The only multiple of 4 in the answer choices is D, 52.

2. A positive integer is said to be “tri-factorable” if it is the product of three consecutive integers. How many positive integers less than 1,000 are tri-factorable?

We’ll use the same tactic, starting with the smallest case.

The smallest tri-factorable number is simply $$1 \times 2 \times 3=$$ 6.

Now 6 may seem like a long way from 1,000 but let’s not give up just yet!

The next one up is $$2 \times 3\times 4=$$ 24. If you keep going, you should get this list:

$$1 \times 2 \times 3= 6$$
$$2 \times 3 \times 4= 24$$
$$3 \times 4 \times 5= 60$$
$$4 \times 5 \times 6= 120$$
$$5 \times 6 \times 7= 210$$
$$6 \times 7 \times 8= 336$$
$$7 \times 8 \times 9= 504$$
$$8 \times 9 \times 10= 720$$
$$9 \times 10 \times 11= 990$$

Look how quickly we got there! Good things can happen if you just keep going.

If you count them up, you should see that the answer is 9.

Some of you might complain, “Ok it happened to work for this one question. What do you do when the list keeps on going and going?”

When that happens, making a list will still help, but another step or tactic will often be necessary.

Here’s one example:

3. How many multiples of 3 are there from 100 to 500?

Again, let’s start by listing some of them out:
$102,\, 105,\, 108,\, 111,\, \ldots$

At this point, it’s not hard to see that this will take forever. Here’s the trick—instead of listing out all the numbers in the middle, let’s list out a few at the end:
$102,\, 105,\, 108,\, 111,\, \ldots 492,\, 495,\, 498$

Now let’s divide each number in the list by 3:
$34,\, 35,\, 36,\, 37,\, \ldots 164,\, 165,\, 166$

See what happened? The numbers are now consecutive. Now the question becomes, “How many numbers are there from 34 to 166?”

If you’re not sure, ask yourself how many numbers there are from 5 to 10.

There are 6.

Now how did you get that?

Perhaps you didn’t realize it, but you subtracted 5 from 10 and then added 1:
$10 – 5 + 1 = 6$

So to get the number of numbers from 34 to 166, we do the same thing:
$166 – 34 + 1 = 133$

Finally, we have the answer, 133.

Although this problem may seem long and complicated, the method we used to solve it applies to many other questions like this (namely, multiple questions). Once you understand it, solving similar questions is a breeze.

Hopefully, you now have a good grasp of how this works. Whenever you get stuck, it’s good to have this strategy in mind. It’s likely to be useful in questions dealing with:

• Multiples
• Questions with Different Cases or Possibilities
• How Many Questions

The more you practice, the better you’ll get at spotting when this strategy should be used. So with that, I leave you with several practice questions that require this technique.

#### Practice Questions

1. How many integers from 200 to 1000 are multiples of 6?

2. In the integer 3,589 the digits are all different and increase from left to right. How many integers between 4,000 and 5,000 have digits that are all different and that increase from left to right?

3. How many positive integers less than 1,000 are not divisible by 3?

4. The sum of the positive odd integers less than 50 is subtracted from the sum of the positive even integers less than or equal to 50. What is the resulting difference?

A) 0
B) 25
C) 50
D) 100

1. 133
2. 10
3. 666
4. B

### 16 thoughts on “SAT Math Strategies That Work: Listing Things Out to Find Patterns”

1. Mathaholic says:

166 – 34 + 1 = 133*

2. Maroosh Qazi says:

where are the answers to the practice questions. answers should be a must otherwise there is no point. i don’t see them anywhere though. and can you please also tell me how to figure out question 4 in a quicker way because if i got it right, if it is option B then it took me really long to figure out.

• Thanks for the reminder.

1. 133
2. 10
3. 666
4. 25

For #4, instead of doing it all out, you should instead list the numbers out as if you were going to add them:

(2 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 10 + … + 50)
– (1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 + … + 49)
—————————————-
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + … + 1 = 25

Notice you get a bunch of 1’s when you line them up and subtract. Now how many 1’s are there? Well, there are 25 even numbers and 25 odd numbers from 1 to 50, so you will have 25 columns lined up. Therefore, you will get 25 1’s.

3. Maroosh says:

Thank you very much for answers. Effort very much appreciated!! And thank you for explaining how to do question 4 in a shorter method. I got all right except question 2 for which i got 6 instead of 10, namely; 4567, 4568, 4569, 4678, 4679, 4789
i really don’t see any other possibilities because the digits always have to increase from left to right. Please help on this one as well. i will be very grateful

4. Maroosh Qazi says:

Thank you very much for the hint however I don’t know what I am doing but I am still only getting 9. The 3 more numbers I have figured out now are: 4578 (as you hinted), 4579 and 4689.

So the complete list is: 4567, 4568, 4569, 4578, 4579, 4678, 4679, 4689, 4789.

5. For your example #2, above, the “trifactorable” problem, I think you overlooked a tenth solution,
0 x 1 x 2 = 2, another positive integer under 1000. Just a quibble! Thanks for the lessons, which I am using for my daughter’s benefit.

6. Zeina says:

This article was of immense help to me .. Thanks a lot!
However, I was wondering whether there is a faster method to come up with the solution for question #2 .. for it takes me quiet a lot of time (and concentration) to reach something .. and then I just end up losing count ..

• Haha, there is no shortcut – you need to write them out. There aren’t as many as you may think 😉

7. Jessica says:

On number 3 the answer is 666 but i keep on calculating 667. why is that?

• courage says:

Its positive integers less than 1000 so 1000 is exclusive

8. Jessica says:

On number 3 the answer is 666 but i keep on calculating 667.
^ about the message above I realized my mistake. I forgot to add one after subtracting the numbers

9. Stan of Arc says:

I think these are the ten numbers:

4567
4568
4569
4578
4579
4589
4678
4679
4689
4789